Our mandate is to increase the expertise of public health actors across Canada in healthy public policy through the development, sharing and use of knowledge.
At the NCCHPP, our interest is in Healthy Public Policy, which we understand to mean public policy that potentially enhances populations' health by having a positive impact on the social, economic, and environmental determinants of health.
We are one of six National Collaborating Centres for Public Health in Canada. Our focus is on the social and economic factors that influence the health of Canadians. We translate and share evidence with public health organizations and practitioners to influence interrelated determinants and advance health equity.
The National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health (NCCDH) is based in Antigonish, Nova Scotia, and is hosted by St. Francis Xavier University.
Our products and services are available and relevant to all organizations that make up the public health sector in Canada, including
*Health authorities/health units
*Ministries of health and public health agencies (provincial and federal)
*Public health associations
*The practitioners, decision makers and researchers that work within public health
Good nutrition is crucial in determining the health and well-being of Aboriginal people in Canada. The economic, social and
psychological burden of nutrition-related chronic disease is high. As experts advising on diet, food and nutrition, Registered
Dietitians play an important role in helping communities to improve their knowledge of nutrition and to better understand how
to make healthy food choices that promote health. This role paper addresses the unique needs of Aboriginal communities in
Canada, including food security and the high cost of store-bought food in some communities, social inequalities and the
environmental threats to traditional food intake.
How are Canadians really doing? Is our overall quality of life getting better or worse? Are we getting closer or moving farther away from realizing the kind of Canada we want to live in?
The second Canadian Index of Wellbeing (CIW) composite report shows in the seventeen year period from 1994 to 2010, Canada's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by a robust 28.9% while our quality of life only improved by a very modest 5.7%. Further, it reveals Canadian wellbeing dropped by 24% between 2008 and 2010 and the decline in our wellbeing continues despite subsequent economic recovery.
This handbook examines key achievements
and shortcomings of Canada’s health care system. It explores what works well, what doesn’t,
and it addresses future challenges to preserving
and enhancing health care.
What makes the Canadian “approach” so
unique is the high value we place on universal
accessibility to doctors and hospitals. The founding vision behind Canada’s health care system
is simply this: access to medical care should be
based on need, not on the ability to pay. [Published July 2006]
This bulletin reports the results of the 2011 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey and compares the experiences of sicker Canadians with chronic conditions to those of the general public.
Cost was shown to be one of the most significant barriers:
23% of sicker Canadians said they had skipped a dose of medication or did not fill a prescription due to cost, compared to just 10% of the general population.
12% of sicker Canadians reported not visiting a doctor due to cost concerns, compared to just 4% of the general population.
Sicker Canadians also fare worse when it comes to the coordination of their care and being engaged in their health care. These issues, as well as recommendations to eliminate the barriers this population faces, are outlined in the bulletin.
This report was undertaken to provide an updated estimate of costs related to HIV/AIDS in Canada, with a
particular focus on the costs of treatment and costs associated with loss of productivity for lost work hours. It is
a follow-up document to the 2001 study The Cost of HIV/AIDS in Canada by Colin Dodds, MA, Ronald Colman,
PhD, Carol Amaratunga, PhD, and Jeff Wilson, BES, GPI Atlantic: http://www.gpiatlantic.org/pdf/health/
This is the Chief Public Health Officer's fourth annual report on the state of public health in Canada. It examines the state of health and well-being of Canadian youth (aged 12 to 19 years) and young adults (aged 20 to 29 years). The report considers many health issues affecting this population such as physical and mental health, injury, sexual and reproductive health and substance use and abuse. By discussing these issues and how they are addressed, the report identifies priority areas for action to maintain healthy transitions of young Canadians into adulthood.
This paper has two purposes. First, it documents the historical context of MINCOME, a Canadian guaranteed annual income field experiment (1974 to 1979). Second, it uses routinely collected health administration data and a quasi-experimental design to document an 8.5 percent reduction in the hospitalization rate for participants relative to controls, particularly for accidents and injuries and mental health. We also found that participant contacts with physicians declined, especially for mental health, and that more adolescents continued into grade 12. We found no increase in fertility, family dissolution rates, or improved birth outcomes. We conclude that a relatively modest GAI can improve population health, suggesting significant health system savings.
Canadian public policy, September 2011, v 37(3): 283-305 [ISSN: 0317-0861 (Print) 1911-9917 (Online)]
The overall purpose of this report is to examine population–based indicators of the health status,
healthcare use, and social determinants of health of the Metis of Manitoba; and we ask the following
questions about these indicators:
Question #1: for each indicator, is there a diff erence between the Metis and all other Manitobans both
provincially, within each of the 11 Regional Health Authorities (RHAs) of Manitoba, and within each of
the three ‘aggregated’ non–urban areas of Rural South, Mid, and North?
Question #2: for each indicator, is there a difference between the Metis within each of the seven MMF
Regions and the overall Metis provincial average?
Question #3: for each indicator, is there a difference between the Metis and all other Manitobans living
within each of the 12 Winnipeg Community Areas (CAs) of Winnipeg RHA?